↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Masks versus prongs as interfaces for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Masks versus prongs as interfaces for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj Prakash, Antonio G De Paoli, Sam J Oddie, Peter G Davis, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 75%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,342,537
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,079
of 12,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,621
of 429,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.