↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013514.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Sereda, Jun Xia, Polly Scutt, Malcolm P Hilton, Amr El Refaie, Derek J Hoare

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,580,552
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,611
of 12,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,103
of 393,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.