↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Yoga for chronic non‐specific low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
100 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Yoga for chronic non‐specific low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010671.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

L Susan Wieland, Nicole Skoetz, Karen Pilkington, Shireen Harbin, Ramaprabhu Vempati, Brian M Berman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Master 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 90 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 93 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#233,535
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#382
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,105
of 499,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.