| Title |
Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004634.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ektoras X Georgiou, Pedro Melo, Ying C Cheong, Ingrid E Granne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 24 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 24 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,323,265
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,832
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,090
of 490,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.