↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
Title
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011335.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew A Kirkman, Julia Day, Karin Gehring, Karolis Zienius, David Grosshans, Martin Taphoorn, Jing Li, Paul D Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,707,572
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,380
of 12,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,568
of 428,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.