↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fundoplication in laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Fundoplication in laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013386.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumit Midya, Debasish Ghosh, Mohamed Wajih Mahmalat

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 46%
Librarian 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unknown 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,059,070
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,530
of 12,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,367
of 429,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.