The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005296.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Mergoni, Martina Ganim, Giovanni Lodi, Lara Figini, Massimo Gagliani, Maddalena Manfredi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Iraq | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 82 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,608,401
of 26,238,332 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,262
of 13,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,407
of 493,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.