↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tirilazad for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Tirilazad for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006778.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shihong Zhang, Lichun Wang, Ming Liu, Bo Wu

Abstract

Delayed cerebral ischaemia is a significant contributor to poor outcome (death or disability) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Tirilazad is considered to have neuroprotective properties in animal models of acute cerebral ischaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 48%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 26 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,763,518
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,434
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,401
of 94,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.