↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013778.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Ammous, Walid Feki, Tamara Lotfi, Assem M Khamis, Rik Gosselink, Ahmed Rebai, Samy Kammoun

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 29 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 30 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,440,441
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,210
of 12,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,843
of 452,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.