| Title |
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013778.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Omar Ammous, Walid Feki, Tamara Lotfi, Assem M Khamis, Rik Gosselink, Ahmed Rebai, Samy Kammoun |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,440,441
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,210
of 12,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,843
of 452,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.