↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013778.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Ammous, Walid Feki, Tamara Lotfi, Assem M Khamis, Rik Gosselink, Ahmed Rebai, Samy Kammoun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 52%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 22 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,554,034
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,546
of 12,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,742
of 445,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.