The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Alternative injectable materials for vocal fold medialisation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009239.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raj Lakhani, Jonathan M Fishman, Nigel Bleach, Declan Costello, Martin Birchall |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 41 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#23,687,666
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,881
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,143
of 195,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#231
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.