↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternative injectable materials for vocal fold medialisation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Alternative injectable materials for vocal fold medialisation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009239.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj Lakhani, Jonathan M Fishman, Nigel Bleach, Declan Costello, Martin Birchall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 34 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Unspecified 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 36 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,266
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,041
of 193,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#218
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.