↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternative injectable materials for vocal fold medialisation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Alternative injectable materials for vocal fold medialisation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009239.pub2
Authors

Raj Lakhani, Jonathan M Fishman, Nigel Bleach, Declan Costello, Martin Birchall

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 30 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,191,579
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,988
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,826
of 175,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#227
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.