↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle-closure glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Iridotomy to slow progression of visual field loss in angle-closure glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012270.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Rouse, Jimmy T Le, Gus Gazzard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 50%
Other 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,004,326
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,781
of 12,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,518
of 426,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.