Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Qi Wang, Jing Wu, Yanfang Ma, Ying Zhu, Xiaoyang Song, Shitong Xie, Fuxiang Liang, Madelaine Gimzewska, Meixuan Li, Liang Yao
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Congo, The Democratic Republic of the||1||8%|
|Members of the public||8||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||8%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||16%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||14||44%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||3%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 448,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.