The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions to improve sanitation for preventing diarrhoea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013328.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie Bauza, Wenlu Ye, Jiawen Liao, Fiona Majorin, Thomas Clasen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,642,371
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,341
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,965
of 486,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.