↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter
Title
Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008472.pub3
Authors

Fuxiang Liang, Shidong Liu, Guangzu Liu, Hongxu Liu, Qi Wang, Bing Song, Liang Yao

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 30%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,401,298
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,188
of 12,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,031
of 429,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.