↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
Title
Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007730.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Scott, Moyra Mills, Amanda Black, Marie Cantwell, Anna Campbell, Chris R Cardwell, Sam Porter, Michael Donnelly

Abstract

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes (MDRPs) have developed in response to the growing number of people living with and surviving cancer. MDRPs comprise a physical component and a psychosocial component. Studies of the effectiveness of these programmes have not been reviewed and synthesised.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 65 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 19%
Psychology 29 11%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 74 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,608,084
of 14,656,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,279
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,647
of 151,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,656,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.