↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
Title
Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007730.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Scott, Moyra Mills, Amanda Black, Marie Cantwell, Anna Campbell, Chris R Cardwell, Sam Porter, Michael Donnelly

Abstract

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes (MDRPs) have developed in response to the growing number of people living with and surviving cancer. MDRPs comprise a physical component and a psychosocial component. Studies of the effectiveness of these programmes have not been reviewed and synthesised.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 335 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 105 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 17%
Psychology 34 10%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 116 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#17,250,712
of 21,346,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,192
of 12,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,373
of 173,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.