↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007862.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Wilson, Ian J Saldanha, Karen A Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Other 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 48 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 49 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,727,202
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,630
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,951
of 472,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.