↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007862.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Wilson, Ian J Saldanha, Karen A Robinson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 28 35%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 3 4%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 28 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,811,512
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,598
of 12,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,589
of 363,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.