↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Active cycle of breathing technique for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007862.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Wilson, Ian J Saldanha, Karen A Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Unspecified 6 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 67 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Unspecified 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 70 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,321,046
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,292
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,317
of 484,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.