↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

School‐based programmes for preventing smoking

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 13,156)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
School‐based programmes for preventing smoking
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001293.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E Thomas, Julie McLellan, Rafael Perera

Abstract

Helping young people to avoid starting smoking is a widely endorsed public health goal, and schools provide a route to communicate with nearly all young people. School-based interventions have been delivered for close to 40 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,949 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 22 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 22 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1955. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,829
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10
of 204,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.