The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non‐progressive acquired brain damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008391.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlie SY Chung, Alex Pollock, Tanya Campbell, Brian R Durward, Suzanne Hagen |
| Abstract |
Executive functions are the controlling mechanisms of the brain and include the processes of planning, initiation, organisation, inhibition, problem solving, self monitoring and error correction. They are essential for goal-oriented behaviour and responding to new and novel situations. A high number of people with acquired brain injury, including around 75% of stroke survivors, will experience executive dysfunction. Executive dysfunction reduces capacity to regain independence in activities of daily living (ADL), particularly when alternative movement strategies are necessary to compensate for limb weakness. Improving executive function may lead to increased independence with ADL. There are various cognitive rehabilitation strategies for training executive function used within clinical practice and it is necessary to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 703 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 689 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 122 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 13% |
| Researcher | 72 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 6% |
| Other | 134 | 19% |
| Unknown | 171 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 22% |
| Psychology | 124 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 85 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 54 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 76 | 11% |
| Unknown | 187 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,352,810
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,656
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,609
of 206,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.