The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effect of longer‐term modest salt reduction on blood pressure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004937.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng J He, Jiafu Li, Graham A MacGregor |
| Abstract |
A reduction in salt intake lowers blood pressure (BP) and, thereby, reduces cardiovascular risk. A recent meta-analysis by Graudal implied that salt reduction had adverse effects on hormones and lipids which might mitigate any benefit that occurs with BP reduction. However, Graudal's meta-analysis included a large number of very short-term trials with a large change in salt intake, and such studies are irrelevant to the public health recommendations for a longer-term modest reduction in salt intake. We have updated our Cochrane meta-analysis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 643 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 633 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 13% |
| Researcher | 61 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Other | 110 | 17% |
| Unknown | 207 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 82 | 13% |
| Unknown | 222 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#269,773
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#424
of 13,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,665
of 205,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.