↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcela Velez, Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo, Daniel F. Patiño Lugo, Claire Glenton, Ana M Posada, Luisa Fernanda Mesa Franco, Stefano Negrini, Carlotte Kiekens, Maria Alejandra Spir Brunal, Anne-Stine Bergquist Roberg, Kelly Mariana Cruz Sarmiento

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 18 49%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 18 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,144,300
of 23,863,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,532
of 12,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,679
of 447,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,863,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.