↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
703 Mendeley
Title
Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007427.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nigel CA Hanchard, Mário Lenza, Helen HG Handoll, Yemisi Takwoingi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 703 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 688 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 162 23%
Student > Bachelor 100 14%
Other 47 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 7%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 133 19%
Unknown 168 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 275 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 16%
Sports and Recreations 34 5%
Social Sciences 15 2%
Psychology 11 2%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 193 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,005,762
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,989
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,424
of 208,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.