| Title |
Advice to stay active as a single treatment for low-back pain and sciatica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003632.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunvor Hilde, Kåre Birger Hagen, Gro Jamtvedt, Michael Winnem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 24% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,675,269
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,526
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,043
of 66,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.