The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The medical use of cannabis for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005175.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth E Lutge, Andy Gray, Nandi Siegfried |
| Abstract |
The use of cannabis (marijuana) or of its psychoactive ingredient delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) as a medicine has been highly contested in many settings.There have been claims that smoked or ingested cannabis, either in its natural form or artificial form (pharmaceutically manufactured drug such as dronabinol), improves the appetites of people with AIDS, results in weight gain and lifts mood, thus improving the quality of life. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 9% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 61 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 476 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Researcher | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 85 | 18% |
| Unknown | 119 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 30% |
| Psychology | 33 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 17% |
| Unknown | 142 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#357,562
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#571
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,287
of 206,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.