↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicines for induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for induction of remission in advanced or late gastric cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005096.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinlin Yang, Linlin Zhu, Zongying Wu, Yiping Wang

Abstract

Gastric cancer is difficult to cure once it progresses to an advanced or late stage. Although some chemotherapies or bio-therapies have made progress in the remission of this disease, the mortality from gastric cancer remains high. A variety of Chinese medicinal herbs have been used to treat gastric cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 24 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,860,080
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,841
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,211
of 145,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.