↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for hiring, retaining and training district health systems managers in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for hiring, retaining and training district health systems managers in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009035.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C Rockers, Till Bärnighausen

Abstract

District managers are playing an increasingly important role in determining the performance of health systems in low- and middle-income countries as a result of decentralization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 21%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Lecturer 10 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Social Sciences 33 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 78 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,335,472
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,200
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,778
of 205,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#223
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.