↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Garlic for peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Garlic for peripheral arterial occlusive disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000095.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth G Jepson, Jos Kleijnen, Gillian C Leng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 55 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 64 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,802,160
of 26,172,861 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,053
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,950
of 206,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,172,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.