The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000352.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ole Olsen, Jette A Clausen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 9% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Ireland | 7 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 97 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 80% |
| Scientists | 17 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 77 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#328,748
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#532
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,895
of 433,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.