↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for self-injurious behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for self-injurious behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fareez Rana, Aynur Gormez, Susan Varghese

Abstract

Self-injurious behaviour among people with intellectual disability is relatively common and often persistent. Self-injurious behaviour continues to present a challenge to clinicians. It remains poorly understood and difficult to ameliorate despite advances in neurobiology and psychological therapies. There is a strong need for a better evidence base in prescribing and monitoring of drugs in this population, especially since none of the drugs are actually licensed for self-injurious behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 27%
Psychology 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Unspecified 8 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 52 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,581,473
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,966
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,168
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.