Title |
Consumers’ and health providers’ views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co‐produced qualitative evidence synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013274.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bronwen Merner, Lina Schonfeld, Ariane Virgona, Dianne Lowe, Louisa Walsh, Cheryl Wardrope, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Vicki Xafis, Cinzia Colombo, Nora Refahi, Paul Bryden, Renee Chmielewski, Fiona Martin, Nancy M Messino, Anne Mussared, Lorraine Smith, Susan Biggar, Marie Gill, David Menzies, Carolyn M Gaulden, Leia Earnshaw, Leslie Arnott, Naomi Poole, Rebecca E Ryan, Sophie Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 38% |
Australia | 8 | 18% |
Ireland | 3 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 62% |
Scientists | 9 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 53 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 55 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,093,473
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,233
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,488
of 427,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.