↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Consumers’ and health providers’ views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co‐produced qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
46 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Consumers’ and health providers’ views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co‐produced qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013274.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bronwen Merner, Lina Schonfeld, Ariane Virgona, Dianne Lowe, Louisa Walsh, Cheryl Wardrope, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Vicki Xafis, Cinzia Colombo, Nora Refahi, Paul Bryden, Renee Chmielewski, Fiona Martin, Nancy M Messino, Anne Mussared, Lorraine Smith, Susan Biggar, Marie Gill, David Menzies, Carolyn M Gaulden, Leia Earnshaw, Leslie Arnott, Naomi Poole, Rebecca E Ryan, Sophie Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 11%
Unspecified 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 44 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Unspecified 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 46 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,074,151
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,175
of 11,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,134
of 425,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.