↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Consumers’ and health providers’ views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Summary Twitter
Title
Consumers’ and health providers’ views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013274.pub2
Authors

Bronwen Merner, Lina Schonfeld, Ariane Virgona, Dianne Lowe, Louisa Walsh, Cheryl Wardrope, Lisa Graham-Wisener, Vicki Xafis, Cinzia Colombo, Nora Refahi, Paul Bryden, Renee Chmielewski, Fiona Martin, Nancy M Messino, Anne Mussared, Lorraine Smith, Susan Biggar, Marie Gill, David Menzies, Carolyn M Gaulden, Leia Earnshaw, Leslie Arnott, Naomi Poole, Rebecca E Ryan, Sophie Hill

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,216,371
of 23,427,600 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,798
of 12,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,135
of 263,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,427,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.