↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intra‐peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non‐gynaecological abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Intra‐peritoneal prophylactic agents for preventing adhesions and adhesive intestinal obstruction after non‐gynaecological abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005080.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Senthil Kumar, Peng F Wong, David J Leaper

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 13 6%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 66 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 71 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,553
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.