↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
Title
Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005123.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael M Beckmann, Owen M Stock

Abstract

Perineal trauma following vaginal birth can be associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity. Antenatal perineal massage has been proposed as one method of decreasing the incidence of perineal trauma.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 539 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 103 19%
Student > Master 65 12%
Student > Postgraduate 51 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 6%
Researcher 34 6%
Other 113 21%
Unknown 146 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 134 24%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 158 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#273,441
of 23,406,603 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#464
of 12,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,890
of 193,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,406,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.