↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Incremental versus standard dialysis for people with kidney failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Incremental versus standard dialysis for people with kidney failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015501
Authors

Dharshana Sabanayagam, Katharine Hegerty, Eric H Au, Nadim A Beruni, Tess E Cooper, Carmel M Hawley, Martin Howell, David W Johnson, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Allison Jaure, Martin Wolley, Amanda Sluiter, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Germaine Wong, Andrea K Viecelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,333,125
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,902
of 12,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,055
of 227,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.