The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Bubble devices versus other pressure sources for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raj Prakash, Antonio G De Paoli, Peter G Davis, Sam J Oddie, William McGuire |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,938,877
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,471
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,465
of 434,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.