↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianne P Verhagen, Celinde C Karels, Sita MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Lex L Burdorf, Anita Feleus, Saede SD Dahaghin, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Conservative interventions such as physiotherapy and ergonomic adjustments (such as keyboard adjustments or ergonomic advice) play a major role in the treatment of most work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 24%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 25 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2010.
All research outputs
#2,415,372
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,147
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,491
of 162,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.