↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work‐related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work‐related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianne P Verhagen, Celinde C Karels, Sita MA Bierma‐Zeinstra, Lex L Burdorf, Anita Feleus, Saede SD Dahaghin, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Conservative interventions such as physiotherapy and ergonomic adjustments (such as keyboard adjustments or ergonomic advice) play a major role in the treatment of most work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 17%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 53 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2010.
All research outputs
#3,953,397
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,511
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,718
of 124,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.