↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work‐related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Ergonomic and physiotherapeutic interventions for treating work‐related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianne P Verhagen, Celinde C Karels, Sita MA Bierma‐Zeinstra, Lex L Burdorf, Anita Feleus, Saede SD Dahaghin, Henrica CW de Vet, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Conservative interventions such as physiotherapy and ergonomic adjustments (such as keyboard adjustments or ergonomic advice) play a major role in the treatment of most work-related complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder (CANS).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2010.
All research outputs
#3,802,284
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,310
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,278
of 121,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.