↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002273.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Tan, Andreas A Schulze, Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis

Abstract

100% oxygen is the commonly recommended gas for the resuscitation of infants at birth. There is growing evidence from both animal and human studies that room air is as effective as 100% oxygen and that 100% oxygen may have adverse effects on breathing physiology and cerebral circulation. There is also the theoretical risk of tissue damage due to free oxygen radicals when 100% oxygen is given. The use of room air has, therefore, been suggested as a safer and possibly more effective alternative.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,127,710
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,738
of 11,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,373
of 167,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.