↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

General versus loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
General versus loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013182.pub2
Authors

Sandra Lee, Carolyne You, Andrew Kucey, Fahad Alam, Giuseppe Papia, Daryl S Kucey, Thomas Forbes, Stephen Choi, Andrew D Dueck, Ahmed Kayssi

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unspecified 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,022,097
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,846
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,701
of 258,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.