↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Digital technology for early identification of exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014606.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chu-Hai Wong, Sherie Smith, Sonal Kansra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 15%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 31 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Unspecified 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 34 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,463,692
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,218
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,197
of 417,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.