↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001340.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miranda Mugford, Diana Elbourne, David Field

Abstract

Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a complex procedure of life support used in severe but potentially reversible respiratory failure in term infants. Although the number of babies eligible for ECMO is small and the use of ECMO invasive and potentially expensive, its benefits may be high.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Master 25 11%
Other 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 51 23%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 63 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,211,300
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,196
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,984
of 96,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.