↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of dental and orthodontic complications in thalassaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Treatment of dental and orthodontic complications in thalassaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012969.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priti Mulimani, Adinegara BL Abas, Laxminarayan Karanth, Raffaella Colombatti, Palna Kulkarni

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,790,831
of 23,662,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,330
of 12,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,498
of 432,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,662,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.