↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007639.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey Daniels, Nicola Mills, Paul Whitaker

Abstract

Nebuliser systems are used to deliver medications to control the symptoms and the progression of lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis. Many types of nebuliser systems are available for use with various medications; however, there has been no previous systematic review which has evaluated these systems.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Unspecified 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 53 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#1,563,361
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,575
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,535
of 192,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.