| Title |
Antiseptic solutions for skin preparation during central catheter insertion in neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013841.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhd Alwi Muhd Helmi, Nai Ming Lai, Hans Van Rostenberghe, Izzudeen Ayub, Emie Mading |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 28% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 6% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 6% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,056,129
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,823
of 12,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,086
of 387,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.