The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002011.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Main, Sarah Rand |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,057,169
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,246
of 13,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,113
of 414,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.