| Title |
Mechanical traction for neck pain with or without radiculopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006408.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine Graham, Anita Gross, Charles H Goldsmith, Jennifer Klaber Moffett, Ted Haines, Stephen J Burnie, Paul Michael J Peloso |
| Abstract |
Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint of the musculoskeletal system which can be disabling and costly to society. Mechanical traction is often used as an adjunct therapy in outpatient rehabilitation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 23% |
| Unknown | 61 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,267,259
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,917
of 12,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,864
of 81,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.