↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mechanical traction for neck pain with or without radiculopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mechanical traction for neck pain with or without radiculopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006408.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Graham, Anita Gross, Charles H Goldsmith, Jennifer Klaber Moffett, Ted Haines, Stephen J Burnie, Paul Michael J Peloso

Abstract

Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint of the musculoskeletal system which can be disabling and costly to society. Mechanical traction is often used as an adjunct therapy in outpatient rehabilitation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 21%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 53 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,143,236
of 21,346,872 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,721
of 12,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,578
of 174,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.