| Title |
Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006405.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate A Hodgson, Dominic Wilkinson, Antonio G De Paoli, Brett J Manley |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 69% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,109,818
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,392
of 12,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,254
of 383,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.