| Title |
Interventions to manage dual practice among health workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008405.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne N Kiwanuka, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Christine Nalwadda, Olico Okui, Freddie Ssengooba, Alison A Kinengyere, George W Pariyo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 19% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,972
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,721
of 116,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.