↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007177.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda Monaghan, Brian Caulfield, Dónal P O'Mathúna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 255 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 78 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 15%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 88 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,275,391
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,854
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,296
of 173,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.