↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003315.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyson Bessell, Lee Hooper, William C Shaw, Sheena Reilly, Julie Reid, Anne-Marie Glenny

Abstract

Cleft lip and cleft palate are common birth defects, affecting about one baby of every 700 born. Feeding these babies is an immediate concern and there is evidence of delay in growth of children with a cleft as compared to those without clefting. In an effort to combat reduced weight for height, a variety of advice and devices are recommended to aid feeding of babies with clefts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 287 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 25%
Student > Bachelor 43 15%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 15%
Psychology 15 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 57 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#672,451
of 14,268,358 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,024
of 10,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,877
of 152,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,268,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.