↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Feeding interventions for growth and development in infants with cleft lip, cleft palate or cleft lip and palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003315.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyson Bessell, Lee Hooper, William C Shaw, Sheena Reilly, Julie Reid, Anne‐Marie Glenny

Abstract

Cleft lip and cleft palate are common birth defects, affecting about one baby of every 700 born. Feeding these babies is an immediate concern and there is evidence of delay in growth of children with a cleft as compared to those without clefting. In an effort to combat reduced weight for height, a variety of advice and devices are recommended to aid feeding of babies with clefts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 424 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 20%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Researcher 27 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 84 20%
Unknown 121 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 12%
Psychology 18 4%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Unspecified 13 3%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 130 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,653,066
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,539
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,432
of 118,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.