↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
627 Mendeley
Title
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003091.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Trish A Gray, Catherine J Walter, Catherine A Sharp, Tamara Page, Rhiannon Macefield, Natalie Blencowe, Thomas Kg Milne, Barnaby C Reeves, Jane Blazeby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 627 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 624 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 12%
Researcher 63 10%
Student > Postgraduate 46 7%
Other 39 6%
Other 105 17%
Unknown 211 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 223 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 226 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#865,057
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,589
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,638
of 425,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.