| Title |
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011334.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiyuan Shi, Ya Gao, Jinhui Tian, Jiang Li, Jianguo Xu, Fan Mei, Zheng Li |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,990,881
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,344
of 12,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,309
of 365,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.