↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium channel blockers for acute traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calcium channel blockers for acute traumatic brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Langham, Caroline Goldfrad, Graham Teasdale, Donald Shaw, Kathy Rowan

Abstract

Acute traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. Calcium channel blockers (calcium antagonists) have been used in an attempt to prevent cerebral vasospasm after injury, maintain blood flow to the brain, and so prevent further damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 44%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,094,202
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,675
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,248
of 52,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.